Thinking About Values in Prospect and Retrospect: Maximizing Experienced Utility
نویسنده
چکیده
Decision-makers often do not or cannot predict at the time of choice how their tastes may change by the time the outcomes are experienced. This paper explores the implications of making decisions by maximizing experienced utility ex post rather than ex ante. Focusing on being satisfied with choice in retrospect results in quite different kinds of problems than a prospective orientation that projects one’s current preferences into the future. We examine a number of ways that people can easily mistake their reactions to outcomes in the future, and propose a series of hypotheses related to how people will be dissatisfied with their choices. Finally, we relate these barriers to good decisions to prescriptive processes that assist people in making decisions with which they will be happy in the future.
منابع مشابه
The Temporal Focus of the Wandering Mind
1 When is your head at? An exploration of the factors associated with the temporal focus of the wandering mind. The temporal focus of the wandering mind 2 ABSTRACT Two experiments employed experience sampling to examine the factors associated with prospective and retrospective focus during mind wandering. Experiment One explored the contribution of working memory to future and past related task...
متن کاملCumulative Prospect Theory and Mean Variance Analysis. A Rigorous Comparison
We compare asset allocations derived for cumulative prospect theory (CPT) based on two different methods: Maximizing CPT along the mean–variance efficient frontier and maximizing it without that restriction. We find that with normally distributed returns the difference is negligible. However, using standard asset allocation data of pension funds the difference is considerable. Moreover, with de...
متن کاملRational Choice Theory: A Cultural Reconsideration
Economists have heralded the formulation of the expected utility theorem as a universal method of choice under uncertainty. In their seminal paper, Stigler and Becker (Stigler & Becker, 1977) declared that “human behavior can be explained by a generalized calculus of utility-maximizing behavior” (p.76). The universality of the rational choice theory has been widely criticized by psychologists, ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1997